Diplophonia I hold fast to an extremely strict meaning of ventriloquist doing ventriloquism or ventriloquy, the workmanship or aptitude of delivering vocal sounds that appear to originate from some place other than the speaker, as takes after:
One who perceives and calls manikins as figures or mannequins (little men}, or other suitable names for affable wooden dummys, not lifeless, generic fakers, loaning voice and hand to breath life into soul manikins in wood shape just, however etched, with few spaces other than for head and mouth to respect history of the artistic expression and well-made sham as a show-stopper itself;
One who perceives and utilizes the correct still lip and jaw strategy, to be specific does not grip teeth which meddles with verbalization and labials, quiets sound and powers undue weight on the throat, yet solidifies the jaw by locking jaw, pulling jaw down and back for rigid jaw muscles, and uses stomach for weight voice and tongue tip to back of upper lip and teeth for labials; and,
One who perceives and performs both inaccessible and twofold voice, and throat shriek, by controlled vocal issue of ventricular phonation and diplophonia, including mimicry of feathered creatures, creatures, or different sounds called polyphony, an expression of craftsmanship, scattered in a straightforward routine of exchange, patter and bits of business, not just jokes alone as done by comic vents not proficient in the workmanship.
W.S. Berger, ventriloquial student of history, Frank Marshall, ventriloquial figure producer, and The Great Lester, vaudeville ventriloquist, all alluded to “figure” in any genuine talk of the ventriloquist sham and both Berger and Marshall conceded to “Lester strategy” for still lip and jaw and far off voice system.
Ventriloquial sounds are best characterized and clarified from the point of view of vocal issue in discourse. The removed voice is “ventricular phonation”. The twofold voice is “diplophonia”.
Ventriloquial mimicry of winged creatures, creatures and different sounds by regular utilization more than 100 years or more came to be called “polyphony”, that originated from music in the early Church, including sounds not from a solitary source but rather various sources, and when congruity was at first viewed as agnostic and satanic.
My first year in school and discourse class teacher approached me to do show. I did far off voice, educator commented “that is ventricular phonation”, at that point did twofold voice, again commented “that is diplophonia” and I always remembered these terms, my major being discourse. I had taken in far off voice from Harry Lester in 1955, missed seeing Fred Ketch the next year, yet year after that was doing what is presently called a stroll around for terrific opening of Winn Dixie in Louisville. A man wearing ranch garments strolled up, said come here I need to show you something, approached me and started singing in inaccessible voice “When the Saints Go Marching In” tune in twofold, triple, fourfold congruity. In driving home 2 hour trip I sang it and sang it again and again until throat was crude, yet I made sense of it, and in process found the throat shriek.
On the off chance that you need to do the twofold voice and throat shriek, next time lifting something substantial with a snort, have a go at singing “When the Saints Go Marching In” tune a la Satchmo with a snarl, or even better the automaton sound of a humming honey bee or honey bees at that point raise the pitch level until you get a gnat sound. The honey bee or honey bees sound is from the vocal ropes and gnat sound is from the false vocal lines or vocal folds. Furthermore, there you have it, with a snort and a snarl one can accomplish the twofold voice, and by practice decrease automatons to a solitary automaton, expel honey bee sound from gnat sound at that point increment the constrain level to accomplish the throat shriek that is utilized as a part of flying creature mimicry, shrill and balancing.